Friday, 20 September 2013

Indian Freedom movement

Background

Vande Mataram.  Sujalam, sufalam, Malayaja Sitalam,shashya shyamalam Mataram.
The land of Bharat, called India by many, is one of the most ancient yet living civilizations on earth. Throughout the ages Bharat has immensely contributed to many disciplines of science, mathematics and philosophy for the betterment of human life. With her enormous wealth and resources India has also been a target of foreign invasions. India has been one nation from time immemorial. In the great epic Mahabharat Indias cultural unity is vividly painted. India has been fighting foreign invasions and domination from the dawn of her history and her fight for freedom still goes on. This presentation will cover Indias struggle for freedom, starting from the early 1700's. 

Between the sixth century Before the Common Era (BCE) and sixth century of the Common Era (CE), the Hindus were able to valiantly shake off foreign domination, including that of Alexander. Those who remained in India were all assimilated in the society at large. Those who sought shelter, like the persecuted Jews, the Persians and the Zoroastrians, are maintaining their culture even today.
Starting from 6th century the invaders like the Turks and the Muslims were attracted to India mainly for her wealth and the freedom fighters continued their struggle for freedom. Then came the Mughals in the 11th century. During each of these invasions thousands were massacred,  and forcibly converted to Islam; thousands of temples and important places of education and social and human developments were plundered and destroyed. Almost for 1000 years, Hindus met with one holocaust after another by the invading barbarians. Renowned historian Will Durant said: The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precarious thing, whose delicate complex of order and liberty, culture and peace may anytime be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within.
Gradually, India was forced to abandon the leadership role in the world of science and thought. Even the Muslim occupation of India and their massive looting of the nation for 600 years did not diminish her wealth, neither could it destroy the civilization; unlike most other invaded nations, India still live with her rich culture & heritage. The 15th century CE saw the advent of the Western adventurers, who set foot on India with financial motives. The Portuguese were the first to arrive and wherever they went, brought tremendous miseries for Indian people through their cruel rule and forcible conversion. The Portuguese were followed by the Dutch, the French and the English, in quick succession. 
The death of the last Mughal ruler Aurangzeb in 1701 initiated the downfall of the Mughal rule and fueled the fight to finally free India from Mughal tyranny. The freedom fighters of Maharashtra, known as the Marathas took over a major part of India in North and South and fulfilled the dreams of Chatrapati Shivaji. All over India, especially in Bengal, Avadh and Deccan, kings became independent. The Mughal empire totally disintegrated after the attacks of Nadir Shah in 1740. 
Soon, the English had outpaced their competitors in establishing their base in India and extended their trade mission in the name of the East India Company.
Establishment of the British Raj

Even though the Battle of Plassey in 1757 was little more than a skirmish, its results were far- reaching. The British won the battle due to the treachery of General Mir Jafar who worked for Siraj-Ud-Doulla, the Nawab of Bengal. This paved the way for the British conquest of Bengal and eventually of the whole of India. In 1761 Marathas were defeated in the battle of Panipat. After 800 long years of Muslim occupation and tyranny, India was cursed with the tyranny of the British occupation. 
England was a poor country with many of its people half starved, illiterate and ill-clad. They came to India as traders, for better fortune, and stole the role of the ruler of the country almost overnight through treachery. They occupied India for almost two centuries and robbed India mercilessly. But, Indian people fought them from day one. 
Economic exploitation reduced the Indian peasantry to servile poverty. For her industrial advancement, Britain needed capital, raw material and markets for their finished goods. India provided a base for all of this and thus British started looting India. Between 1747 and 1757 England paid over 450,000 Pounds of Gold to India for imports at an exchange rate of 2.8 Pounds per Rupee. When the British left India in 1947, the exchange rate was one Pound to 5 Rupees! India, which was famous for her hand-made cloth, especially muslin was forced to compete with the machine made yarn of Britain. In order to completely destroy this industry they cut the thumbs of thousands of weavers in Bengal. Slowly, they destroyed many age-old traditional indigenous industries. Rage and resentment against the English also grew. 
Early fight against British During the great famine of 1769 to70 the British sent massive amount of food grains to England when thousands of people starved to death in India. Throughout North Bengal peasants revolted, lead by Bhavani Pathak. This revolution went on for 3 decades. The number of revolutionaries were at least 50 thousand. To destroy this revolt the British burnt hundreds of villages and killed even women and children. The Sanyasi or 'Saint' revolt started in 1760 and lasted till 1800, when it was brought to a brutal end by the British. In 1783 there was a peasant revolt in Rangpur, East Bengal. This movement was crushed with maximum brutality by the British. 
In 1784 in Rajmahal, near the border of Bengal and Bihar, the Santhal revolt started under the great leadership of Tilka Majhi. In the final round of the battle he was caught after a great fight. He was pulled by a horse all around the city and finally was hanged.
In Tinevelle of Tamilnadu the local Poligar kings revolted against the British under the leadership of Pandeyam Kottabomman in 1799. After long battles Kottabomman was caught and hanged. 
On the night of 10th July 1806 about 1800 Indian soldiers revolted against the British and took control of Vellore Fort. But they could not save it for long, because additional forces and canons were used by the British to brutally kill over one thousand of these revolutionaries. 
In 1808 The British tried to occupy Trivankur. Diwan Velu Thampi led a massive resistance against them and sought help from France and America. But, after one year of fighting, Velu lost and finally died in the jungle. The state had a superior military power and successful manufacturers and traders as well. But within ten years of Ranjit Singhs death in 1839, the kingdom was swallowed up by the English in a series of two Anglo-Sikh Wars. 
In 1824 the British tried to attack Kittur, a small kingdom in todays Karnataka state. Queen Chennamma took up the sword to fight against the British. Eventually she was caught by the British and died in 1829. But the fight did not stop. A poor guard named Raianna restarted the war. After many battles, he was also caught and was hanged in 1830. 
Assam had a heroic tradition of having steadfastly repulsed the Muslim invaders until the Ahom kings got engaged in infights. The British eventually overtook Assam in 1826. 
Professor Derozio of Hindu College in Calcutta was a genuine India-lover. He influenced many educated young people in Bengal in patriotism and formed 'Young India' which sowed the seeds for future revolutionary movements.
Vanavasis or the forest dwelling people in Bihar and parts of Bengal again revolted during 1835 to 1855, which was called the Santhal Revolt. It was against the unjust orders imposed on them by the British. The Santhal Revolt had its repercussions in other parts of the country. In the end, all the leaders of this movement were killed including the legendary heroes Sidho and Kanu. 
When the British first came to India, they found to their surprise a culture with strong roots and traditions, one that could not be easily shaken. They concluded that if they were to be successful in ruling the country, they would have to create a sense of inferiority in the Indian psyche, while at the same time, promoting their own superiority. 
In 1773, the Asiatic society was founded with the stated intention of studying Indian history and culture. Ancient Hindu texts were translated into English. The ultimate purpose of these translations was to aid the spread of Christianity by undermining the Hindu religion. Max Mueller, the so-called great Indologist, outlined a plan to systematically reduce the faith of the Indians in their own heritage, while at the same time promoting white supremacy. He advocated sending Christian missionaries to India in greater numbers. The British started rewriting Indian history to serve their purpose which was to create inferiority amongst the Indians and to cut off the nation from its continuous stream of history and all her past glories. 
By 1849, the whole of the country had come under the British administration by fair means or foul. But, unrest and rebellions against them were everywhere. In 1793, the peasants of Vizianagaram, near Vishakhappatnam rose in revolt against the British and stopped paying taxes to them. The agitation further continued up to the beginning of the present century, when Alluri Seetarama Raju died, after making the Manyam Peasant Rebellion immortal. Palashi Kerala Varma's rebellion in Kerala in the beginning of the 19th century, was a great one. There were also vanavasi rebellions all over India against the British. Many of these patriots were called bandits and thugs by the British and were shot dead. 
Great War of Independence : 1857

The British recruited thousands of Indians in their army to rule the country who were commonly called Sepoys. On 29th March, 1857 young Mangal Pandey gave a clarion call to all the Indian soldiers to revolt against the British. But he was caught and was sentenced to death and the Great war of Independence started within 2 months. 
The war of 1857 shook the mighty fabric of the Empire to its very foundations. There were economic, religious and military factors that contributed to this war. The introduction of the Enfield Rifle, cartridges of which were greased with animal fat, were a source of great strife among the troops which finally sparked off the war. 
Nana Saheb, the last of the Peshvas of Maharashtra, set out to organize this discontent and succeeded in building up an excellent organization throughout the country. The sepoys or soldiers in service of the English were in sympathy with Nana. The revolt was slated to start all over the country on 31st May 1857. But, some over enthusiastic persons could not restrain themselves. The war broke out in a haphazard fashion everywhere on 10th May, 21 days in advance of the schedule. 
The war, though an outbreak of a formidable nature, failed due to defective organization of the insurgents. Unfortunately, the insurgents could not get the united and universal support of the civil population in all parts of the country, many of them were alienated by the confusion and disorder which followed the uprising. 
The great leader of this war, Tatia Tope and his commander Jaola Prasad who killed hundreds of British soldiers were caught and hanged. Bahadur Shah Jafar, one of the leaders, said: As long as Indian people had self-respect, one day London would feel the repercussions from India. Rani Lakshmibai of Jhansi created history by fighting a great battle against the British. She succumbed to her wounds in the battlefield. British stopped the war after burning thousands of houses, killing women, children and elderly indiscriminately. Many great heroes fought against the British in various parts of India during that time. Kuor Singh of Bihar fought a heroic battle and became a martyr. Rao Tularam of Hariana went to collect arms from Russia, but he died on the way. Surendra Sain of Orissa also fought for a long time and died in the jail. Maniram Diwan and Piali Barua of Assam were sentenced to death. 
The British succeeded in crushing this War of Independence, but it forced the British to reconsider their approach towards Indians. The British crown abolished the East India Company and took over the reins of administration directly. India became the brightest jewel in the British Crown and every 6th persons prosperity in Britain was dependent upon resources taken from India. 
From the First war to the birth of Congress (1857-1891)

In the late 1850s the Britishers forced the peasants of Bengal to grow Neel or indigo instead of regular crops, which would increase their profit in the cloth business and also imposed taxes. Bengal revolted against this, and it resulted in the Neel revolt of 1862.
Between 1865 and 1875 Guru Ramsingh Kooka organized an armed agitation in Punjab. Ram Singh sent Gurucharan Singh to get help from Russia. The Russian traveler Vereschogin described how cruelly this movement was suppressed by the British. Called mercy killing, each person was tied in front of the canon and was blown away. 
Britishers took thousands of Indian people to other parts of the world as indentured labors promising a great future and a return after short service to the countries like South Africa, Mauritius, Fiji and West Indian islands such as Trinidad & Tobago and Surinam. But alas! They could never come back to their motherland again! Many freedom fighters and revolutionaries were also transported to these countries. Their unwritten pain, agonies and miseries echoes in the meadows of history. Mohandas Karam Chand Gandhi, the future Mahatma Gandhi went to South Africa in search of fortune. 
In India, the writings of Vishnu Hari Chiplumkar, Ranade, Gopal Ganesh Agarkar, Tilak, Jyotirao Phule in Maharastra, Jhaverchand Meghani in Gujrat and Dinabandhu Mitra, Mukund Das, Rajanikant, Rajnaryan Basu and others of Bengal kindled the spirit of nationalism among the educated class of India. In 1872 Rajnarayan Basu first sang a national song and expressed the vision of this ancient nation :"...I see in my mind the noble and puissant Hindu Nation rousing herself after sleep and rushing headlong towards progress with divine prowess this rejuvenated Nation again illumining the world by knowledge, spirituality and culture and the glory of Hindu Nation again spreading over the whole world." Rajnaryan was the grand father of Shri Aurovindo. Soon after Rishi Bankim Chandra composed the great Vandemataram song in 1876, which inspired thousands of freedom fighters and soon became India's national song. 
A nationwide armed struggle took off from the dying embers of the 1857 movement. It sparked off the struggle of Vasudev Balawant Phadke, who inspired hundreds of revolutionaries to fight against the British oppression. The Chapekar brothers, inspired by Vasudev, jumped into the scene soon after. Their efforts at armed struggle ended with their imprisonment for the slaying of the infamous collector Rand, of Pune, for his untold atrocities on the civilians of Pune during the Plague menace. They were hanged in 1897. This incident moved young Vinayak Damodar Savarkar in Nasik and he took a vow in front of the family deity to overthrow the British regime. He founded Mitra Mela and the Abhinav Bharat', a secret society for revolutionaries. Savarkar initiated many young men into Abhinav Bharat. At that time, Shyamji Krishna Varma offered a scholarship to him for higher studies abroad. Savarkar proceeded abroad, with the dual intention of pursuing his higher education, and of giving himself a broader base from which to operate his revolutionary activities. At the behest of Abhinav Bharat, Madanlal Dhingra slew Sir Curzon Willie for poisoning the young Indian minds against their own motherland; young Anant Laxman Kanhere of Aurangabad killed Jackson, the District Collector of Nasik for his agonizing torture of all revolutionaries, including Abhinav Bharat's Baba Savarkar. Both of the young men were sentenced to death. In 1876 Pandit Shibnath Shastri Initiated Bipin Pal and many other youth into revolutionary activities. The Sanjivani Sabha was established by Rajnarayan Basu and Rabindranaths older brother Jyotindranath. 
The non-revolutionary path of struggle also started by then. Surendra Nath Banerjee's Indian Association of Bengal, Justice Mahadev Ranade's Sarvajanik Sabha in Maharashtra, Subrahmanya Bharathi's Madras Mahajan Sabha and Feroze Shah Mehta's Bombay Presidency Association were very helpful in awakening the masses to their rights. In 1883, the Ilbert Bill was introduced which deprived Indian judges the ability to prosecute non-Indians and resulted in nation-wide protest and boycott of foreign goods. 
Babington Macaulay introduced a new system of English education in India, replacing the age old traditional schools that existed in almost every village. His goal was, in his own words: To create Indians with Indian skin and look, but British at heart. The success of the British mission can be seen in many forms, even today. Many cities are still called by the names given by the British. The British left India, but left behind a large class of Brown Sahibs with slave-like mentality. 
The British not only took over India politically, they invaded India socially and culturally as well. They managed to shake the devotion and faith of the Indian people in her past achievements and the glory of this nation. This harm was recognized by the philosophical and cultural leaders of India, but many political leaders did not understand this. The cultural and religious leaders tried in their way to combat the social and cultural invasion. They strengthened the faith of the Hindus in their culture. Raja Rammohan Roy founded the Brahmo Samaj in 1828. Keshab Chandra Sen joined later. Prarthana Samaj started its work in 1867 through notaries like Bhandarkar, Chandavarkar and Mahendra Ranade. The Arya Samaj founded by Swami Dayananda Saraswati started functioning in Bombay in 1875 and in Lahore in 1877, which spread intense nationalism among the masses. Their efforts converged at one goal which was to rejuvenate the faith of the Hindus in their age-old Vedas and Upanishads. On August 14, 1879 Swami Dayananda Saraswati appealed for the use of indigenous goods only and the boycott of foreign goods. This had a great impact in the country. Besides these three Samajas, there were others like the great reformer Vidyasagar of Bengal, the Theosophical Society of India, founded in Madras in 1882 by Annie Besant and other theosophists who had great faith in Indian philosophy. 
In order to ensure that the Indian resentment against the British should not go out of control, the British had to find an outlet for the bottled up resentment of the Indian masses. So they aided in the formation of the Indian National Congress, founded in Bombay in 1885 by Allen Octavian Hume, under the protection and patronage of Lord Dufferin. 
Soon some of the leaders in Congress realized the plans of the British and started fighting against their injustice. The first leaders of the Congress such as Gopal Krishna Gokhale and Motilal Nehru were moderates, and fought only by the constitutional methods. Many of these Congress leaders were greatly under the influence of English education and culture, and believed that they were aiding the birth of a new nation, whereas India is one of the oldest nations and civilizations. 
The 'Aryan Invasion Theory,' was an example of the British attempt at establishing Western supremacy. By spreading the myth that Europeans invaded India, defeated the Dravidians and drove them further south, and that European blood was flowing in Indian veins, and white skin is beautiful, they sowed the seeds of division between north and south India. British also separated the Sikhs from the mainstream Hindu society.
The British provoked the resentment of Muslims against the majority Hindus, for the former were, after all, the rulers in many pockets of the country. Many measures were taken to this end: Bengal, which then comprised Assam, Bihar and Orissa, along with pre-independence Bengal, was strategically divided, such that the eastern portion would be a Muslim majority area. This way, the Muslims would win the elections of East Bengal. The English, thus encouraged the ever widening gap between the Muslims and the Congress. The Muslim League was formed in 1906, with the indirect sanction of the English, and was supposed to mirror the political ambitions of the Muslim people. Their ambition to regain the lost glory of Muslim occupation in India was encouraged. 
In 1891 Tikendrajit Singh and his army chief Thangal of Manipur fought against the British and both gave life in the gallows. While following his studies, Aurovindo Ghosh, who would later become the celebrated great sage of modern India, together with Charu Chandra Datta formed a secret society in London called Lotus and dagger in 1891. They contacted the Irish revolutionaries of Sin Feinn for help, but to no avail. 
Role of Vivekananda
Swami Vivekananda, the disciple of Shri Ramkrishna Paramhansa, presented Hindu Dharma with élan and éclat at the Parliament of Religions in Chicago in 1893 made the whole world aware of the greatness of India, her religions and culture. After his return to India he electrified the whole nation with his clarion call: "Arise, awake and stop not till the goal is reached".
Prophetically he saw the future and demanded his countrymen to come forward to work for the nation saying that: "For the next fifty years this alone should be our keynote - this, our great Mother India. ... This is the only God that is awake.....". The next decades were to follow with the birth of dozens of great freedom fighters. In exactly 50 years, India became free of British occupation. Netaji Subhas Bose said: "Swami Vivekananda may be regarded as the spiritual father of the modern nationalist movement." Pandit Nehru said: Rooted in the past and full of pride in India's heritage, Vivekananda was yet modern in his approach to life's problems and was a kind of bridge between the past of India and her present. Directly or indirectly, he has powerfully influenced the India today." After the passing of Swami Vivekananda, Sister Nivedita announced: "Swamiji is verily our national hero, my role is to awaken the nation." She encouraged and assisted revolutionaries by providing shelter and funds and throughout her life she tried to make India independent culturally, economically and politically. 
Early Congress : 1893 - 1918

Lala Lajpat Rai from Punjab, Bal Gangadhar Tilak from Maharashtra and Bipin Chandra Pal from Bengal became the trio-heroes of the nation and were fondly called Lal-Bal-Pal. The freedom movement of the nation was at times lacking mass participation. Tilak came up with a visionary idea: to celebrate Ganesh Festival and Shivaji Utsav to instill patriotism amongst people, which literally brought the fight from the Council halls to the streets. Rabindranath introduced the Shivaji Utsav in Bengal. Finally Tilak declared: "Swaraj (independence) is my birth-right." By then, Congress had two distinct groups - moderates and the extremists. 
Through Mitra Mela, Savarkar recruited writers, poets and artists who spread the message of nationalism. In Bengal, Aurobindo Ghosh, Chittaranjan Das and P. Mitra became the pioneers of the secret revolutionary movement called Ansulian Samiti. Aurobindo sent Jatindra Mookerjee from Baroda to Calcutta to impart military training to the revolutionaries. Aurobindos brother Barin Ghosh came to Calcutta after learning the technology to make bombs. Later on Jatindranath opened an ashram and took the name Niralamba Swami, who initiated the father and uncle of Bhagat Singh into revolutionary activities. 
Vikhaji Rustam Kama helped the recolutionaries in collecting arms and training from England and France. The Munda revolt became a very powerful struggle against the British. The great vanavasi leader of this movement, Birsa Munda gave his life in the British jail in 1900 after tremendous torture. 
The bifurcation of Bengal in 1905 sparked off another revolutionary movement in Bengal. But the very act of division revolutionized the province of Bengal in particular, and the whole of India in general. The Swadeshi Movement called for boycott of foreign goods. Self-rule was declared as the right of every one. National schools were set up, the intention being to counteract the British influence in the field of education, by imparting nationalist education. Many revolutionary parties and bands took birth during this time. The first bomb exploded on 23rd December 1907. On 30th April 1908, Khudiram Bose and Prafulla Chaki threw a bomb to kill Magistrate Kingsford. Khudi Ram, who was hanged at the age of 19, became a martyr and a hero, so much so that his photographs had an immense sale value.
Sri Aurovindo guided many revolutionaries all over India. He edited many nationalistic newspapers and magazines where his powerful writings inspired many. He was arrested in 1908 for the Alipore Conspiracy Case. Later on he moved to Pondichery and lead the life of a spiritual master. Through his speeches and writings he had provided the vision of future India and guided the patriots till his maha samadhi. 
Punjab also played its part in the revolutionary movement. Sardar Ajit Singh, the uncle of Saheeed Bhagat singh , who spearheaded the movement, was a revolutionary of the Bharat Mata Society of Lahore. He revolted against the repressive Colonialization Act, which cheated the peasants of Lyallpur of the fruits of their own labor. 
Severely repressive sentences were passed to crush the revolutionary activities. Lokmanya Tilak was sentenced to six years of imprisonment. Agitation against this and the partition of Bengal started everywhere. As an outcome of this, in 1911, the division of Bengal was abandoned, and Bengal was unified. Rabindranath, the Nobel-laureate sage poet played a major role in this movement. His patriotic songs and writings inspired the freedom fighters. 
Promoting separatism was part of the British Divide and rule policy. The Act of 1909 introduced separate electorates for Muslims. In 1919, the Sikhs also got separate electorates. The Act of 1935 gave separate representation to Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians, Europeans and the Harijans. The creation of Pakistan was one of the major consequences of this communal representation. 
While they were in jail, many of these revolutionaries were fed by British with Communist literature to divert their nationalism and patriotism. Some of these revolutionaries established the communist party of India. Being the patrons of a foreign ideology, Indian communists showed more support towards the cause of communism than the cause of their motherland and on many occasions betrayed the people of India. 
Indian people living abroad had a major role in Indian struggle for freedom. Indian people around the world in Burma, Singapore, Japan, Afganisthan, Germany, England, Canada and America were constantly providing support to various revolutionary activities. The Gadar Party was formed in the USA to support the cause of freedom struggle and also to protect Hindus living in America from persecution. It had among its leaders Lala Hardayal Rash Behari Bose, Sachindra Sanyal, Ganesh Pingale, Sohan Singh Vakhna and Bhogi Kartar Singh, who were planning a war against the British. 
On 29th September 1914 a Canadian Ship named 'Komagata Maru' with 400 freedom fighters reached Calcutta. There was a great battle between the British force and the Gadarites. Many of the Gadarites died, some escaped and the rest were sent to jail.
Soon, an all India Revolt was to start on 21st February 1915. Vigorous preparations were made for this. Millions of dollars were collected for arms and ammunition. Then Gadarites contacted Indian soldiers in the far East, South East Asia and all over India, and persuaded many regiments to revolt. The revolt was unfortunately doomed to end in failure. One Kirpal Singh passed on all the secret plans to the Government. The Gadaraites were tried in the Lahore Conspiracy Case and a heavy punishment was imposed on them.
Jalianwalabag

In 1918, The Rowlatt Act was introduced which made a provision that any political subject could be arrested and imprisoned without inquiry or assigning any reason. Both Mahatma Gandhi and Tilak condemned the action of the government in strongest possible terms. And again, the country rose, imbued with the spirit of rebellion and patriotism. Martial law was Imposed in Punjab.
On 12th April, 1919, a proclamation was issued by General Dwyer, that no meetings or gathering of the people were to be held. There was a public meeting on the 13th of April at 4.30 P.M. in the Jallianwalla Bagh, a public courtyard, which neither General Dwyer nor other authorities took any action to stop. The Jallianwallabagh is closed practically on all sides except at the entrance. General Dwyer entered the Jallianwala Bagh with armored cars and troops, and ordered them to fire and continue to do so till the whole of the ammunition at his disposal was exhausted. The victims were unarmed, peaceful people, consisting of men, women and children, congregated at a public meeting. Hundreds were massacred. The carnage, of such heinous magnitude awakened the whole country. Dwyer did not escape the crime without retribution, Sardar Udham Singh slew him in 1940. 
Khilafat
By then, Mahatma Gandhi had come back from South Africa to join the freedom struggle. Gandhiji became the apostle of the Hindu values of non-violence and peace. He introduced spirituality as the base of his non-violent movement. 
After the defeat of Germany in the First World War, Turkey was divided and the post of Khalifa, or the symbolic head of all Mislims, was dissolved. The Allies played a large part in this. Therefore, the Indian Muslims revolted against the British to restore the post of Khalifa. Gandhiji saw it as an opportunity for courting the Muslim support in the nationalist struggle, and extended the Congress support for the Khilafat movement. Unfortunately Congress, by acting in concert with the movement, strengthened the extra-national attitude and the Pan-Islamic agenda of the Muslims. Much to the national humiliation, the Indian Muslims sent representations to the religious leaders of Afghanistan and Arabia to accept the position of the Khalifa. So, the Khilafat Movement was an agitation doomed to failure from the very beginning. Gandhiji proposed to start a non-cooperation movement against the British for self-rule and Khilafat both. Accordingly, a resolution was passed by the Congress. The non-violent non-cooperation movement was launched. Many persons left their jobs and students their studies in 1920 & 1921. Great persons like Chittaranjan Das, Dr. Rajendra Prasad, Vinoba Bhave, Rajagopalachari, Madan Mohan Malavya, Sarojini Naidu, Abdul Gaffar Khan, K.M.Munshi and Dr. S. Radhakrishnan gave up their career and joined the movement. 
Dr. Hedgewar and the birth of RSS

Many English-educated national leaders of those times had implicitly come to believe what the British rulers had to tell them, and had consequently lost faith in the ancient heritage of the nation. But there were few others who loved their ancient traditions and culture, and one of them was Dr. Keshav Baliram Hedgewar. He had participated in both the revolutionary and non revolutionary movements for freedom. But he was not happy with the leaders and their paths. He wondered why the land of Ram, Sita, Krishna, Rana Pratap and Shivaji had become so weak. How could a tiny nation, which was 6000 miles away, control such a huge nation, with a population of 300 million. He concluded that British dedication and loyalty to their country and excellent organizational skills was the secret of their success. This was what India lacked. For a living nation, an organized nation would be replete with power and glory. Dr. Hedgewar believed that the ancient tradition taught by the sages should be a strong commanding force. This could only be done by organizing the people into a united force. 
Dr. Hedgewar started with a few youth, in what Swami Vivekananda said was a man making mission. He realized that without citizens with great character and love for their country and people can neither serve the nation nor the world. RSS was founded in 1925 to lead the country in the fight of social and cultural freedom The swayamsevaks participated in Satyagraha, Quit India, and many other movements and today it is serving the entire nation in hundreds of different areas. 
Congress and advent of Gandhiji After the death of Lokamanya Tilak, Gandhiji became the sole leader of Congress. The Congress leaders intended to ask for dominion status by the end of 1929. But the attitude of the British government was different. Lord Irwin said that India would be granted self-rule within the British Empire. But Congress wanted swarajya, or complete self-rule. When the Congress met on the banks of the River Ravi, near Lahore in 1929, they declared complete independence as their goal. 26th January, 1930 was declared Independence Day and a pledge was taken by the people of India on that date, which was repeated every year thereafter. 
On 12th March, 1930, Mahatma Gandhi started his famous Dandi March to break the salt laws, inspiring countless people into following his example. Meanwhile. the Simon Commission's report was published wherein it was stated that British ruled territories would be granted self government and the whole of India would be a Union of State governments and princely states.
Three Round Table Conferences were held in England to discuss Indias future. The first Round Table Conference of 1930, which discussed the Simon Commission, was not attended by Indian leaders, due to the Civil Disobedience movement. 
The Civil Disobedience movement started on January 4, 1932. The British Government responded with the most uncivilized behavior, from torturing women and children to setting fire to houses. Even the police was encouraged to loot and rape. Bertrand Russel wrote: The British committed mis-deeds in India quite as serious as Nazis doing in Germany. 
The British wanted Gandhiji as the national representative at the second Round Table Conference. Hence the Gandhi-Irwin pact was signed; As per this pact the Govt. of India was to make concessions and Congress was to withdraw the civil disobedience movement. However, the communal bodies did not see Gandhiji as the national leader. In this Conference, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the champion for the people of backward classes and a key player in writing the constitution of free India, pleaded for separate representation for Harijans on the lines of Muslim demands. And, the Second Round Table Conference was a failure. The Third Round Table Conference of 1932 was unattended by Indians.
Muslim majority provinces of Sindh and North-West Frontier Province had already been created. Govt. of India Act of 1935 gave the provinces the right of self-government. The Muslim League session was held in Lahore in 1940, wherein the Pakistan theory was proposed, which suggested Muslims could not live under the rule of the majority Hindus and they needed a separate homeland and they proposed the division of India into three parts: India, East Pakistan and West Pakistan. Indian national leaders exercised their vehement disapproval of the idea, and Dr. Rajendra Prasad, first president of free India, called it an impossibility. The communist leaders in India supported the idea of a separate homeland for Muslims.
In 1940 Congress under the leadership of Maulana Abul Kalam Azad demanded full independence and suggested Civil disobedience which was not approved by Gandhiji. 
The Revolutionaries

Several other insurrections, all over the country took place. To mention a few, we have the Kakori case, the killing of Saunders in Punjab by Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Azad, as an act of vengeance against his ill-treatment of Lala Lajpat Rai, the throwing of a bomb in the Central Assembly on 8th April, 1929 by Sardar Bhagat Singh and Batukeshwar Dutta and so on. The Chittagong movement headed by Master Surya Sen, looted the armory, actually freed Chittagong for a span of 8 days and declared freedom. In 1931 Chandra Sekhar Azad, another colleague of Bhagat Sing fought with the police in a fierce battle and gave his life in Allahabad after killing many police officers.
On 8th December 1930, Benoy Bose, Badal Gupta and Dinesh Gupta dressed as Europeans entered the Writers building in Calcutta and shot dead Simpson, the Inspector General of prisons and injured other officials. Dinesh was hanged and other two killed themselves. 
Bhagat Singh Sukhdev and Rajguru were hanged by the British and wrote their names amongst the great freedom fighters in the world; unfortunately the Congress leaders including Gandhiji remained silent about the treacherous verdict of a tribunal. 
Jatin Das, a great revolutionary, fasted for 63 days and died in protest of ill treatment towards the freedom fighters.
Between 1931 and 33 Bengal revolutionaries became very active again. At Midnapore three magistrates in succession were murdered. The collector of Comilla was shot dead by two young girls, Santi Ghosh and Sumita Choudhury. The Superintendent of Tripura police was shot dead. Pritilata and Kalpana Dutta of Surya Sens group bombed the railway institute in Chittagung. Governor Jackson was shot dead by Bina Das.
Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose was a favorite leader of the masses. He became the President of the Congress Party twice. After the disagreement with Gandhiji regarding the path for freedom struggle, he quit Congress and formed a party named Forward Block. While Gandhiji and Jawharlal Nehru supported Britain in its efforts for the 2nd World War, Netaji moved throughout India addressing people not to support Britain as its breakup would bring freedom for India. Subhas Bose and his supporters were soon put in jail. In London he said: Britain had destroyed India economically, politically, culturally and spiritually.
After secret communications with leaders like Veer Savarkar and Rashbehari Bose, on January 17, 1941 Netaji escaped from his home detention in Calcutta. After this historic near impossible escape from the British police and intelligence, he crossed Indian Border by foot in Afghan dress and reached Berlin via Kabul and Moscow. In Germany he recruited 3000 Indian War Prisoners to form one regiment of the Indian National Army. In March 1942 Rasbehari Bose formed Azad Hind Fauz or Indian National Army in Tokyo. In June 1943 Netaji arrived in Tokyo via submarine, and INA was handed over to him by Rasbehari Bose. Netaji Thundered: Give me blood, I'll give you freedom. 
Congress - 2

In 1942, the British Government commissioned Stafford Cripps to form the Cripps mission, which set forth the proposal that India will be given independence inside the British Dominion. 
The Cripps' proposal came under severe criticism. Gandhiji expressed his disillusionment of the concept of co-operation between Hindus and Muslims. Congress launched the Bharat Chodo Andolan or Quit India movement on Aug. 8, 1942. Gandhiji introduced the mantra: 'Karenge ya marange: Do or die.' But even before the movement started, the British threw all the national leaders behind bars. Many people gave their lives in the hands of British at this time. Seventy year old Matangini Hazra was shot dead in Medinipore. The Quit India Movement was subdued totally by October, 1942, in two and a half months. The Indian communists offered help to British to sabotage this movement and the British made full use of it.
Netaji

The INA, or the Indian National Army, was organized in East and South-East Asia by Ras Behari Bose and Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose, to give armed resistance to the British, as opposed to the non-violent and non-cooperation movement of Gandhiji. They decided to take advantage of the raging Second World War and took the assistance of Japan. Netaji gave a rousing call : 'Delhi Chalo: Let us go to Delhi.' The INA penetrated the Indian borders, and reached Assam. The British Government, being seriously concerned about the progress and popularity of INA, started massive anti-Netaji propaganda, and the Indian communists helped the British to accomplish this task. 
But with the defeat of Japan, INA also had to accept defeat. Quit India movement and INA, both were unsuccessful. But due to the popularity of the INA, the British were forced to release all the soldiers unconditionally after a historic trial. The INA created a tremendous wave of force within the country. In February 1945 the Royal Indian Navy revolted against the British which was followed by the Air Force as well. The British were convinced by then that they could not keep India under their thrall much longer. 
On August 16, 1946, Mohammed Ali Jinnah, the future father of Pakistan, gave a call for Direct Action. Massacres of thousands of Hindus occurred in Bengal in broad daylight and particularly in Calcutta under the Govt. headed by Suharawardy. This is known as the Great Calcutta Killings, which spread to other parts of India.
Partition of the nation
Then came the black day, the proposal of the division of the country was placed before the nation by the Viceroy Mountbatten in March 1947. The political scene at that time was ripe with mistrust and non cooperation. Being disgusted with the behavior of the Muslim League leaders, Sardar Patel had concluded that it was impossible to work with the Muslim League. Pandit Nehru gave his approval within four or five days. It was during this time that Gandhiji told Maulana Azad that his body should be divided before India was divided - a remark which was to become very famous. But Gandhiji gave his assent to the division after two meetings with Mountbatten. It was an event which embarrassed and shocked the country. The nation had been betrayed; and by its own leaders! 
Mountbatten hastened to England, and an elaborate plan for partition was drafted before his return to India in May 1947. His proclamation, which was announced on 3rd June 1947, proposed to divide India into India, east and west Pakistan and 600 princely states. But the whole nation was against this. The Congress Working Committee, which met on June 14, 1947, also strenuously opposed the move to partition the country. They had to be brought around with the direct intervention of Gandhiji. Finally, the move to divide the country was approved by Congress-by 29 votes against 15.
As the time drew closer for the British to depart from India, things began to move very rapidly. Britain looted Indias wealth for 200 years. But during this time they made all efforts to transfer as much jewelry, gold and diamonds as they could. Invaluable masterpieces of paintings and sculptures were overnight moved to London. Even fifty years after the independence, Britain possesses most of these invaluable materials of India. Mountbatten transferred power to Indian hands on August 15, 1947, a full ten months before the slated date. That did not give Congress any time to ponder the implications of partition. Acting mainly on immense pressure from the British and Gandhiji, who himself appeared to have succumbed to British pressure, Congress agreed to the partition. In retrospect, if they had had more time to debate the issue, public opinion may have pressured them to vote against the partition. This was also the opinion of Guru Golwalkar, then the head of the RSS, who urged the Congress to wait for six months. But the British were in a hurry to leave, and decided to press the issue. The result was the partition of India and the ensuing blood bath, where hundreds of thousands of people lost their lives in this holocaust. The nation got the long awaited freedom, but at what expense. The nation had to accept the division and loss of land as well as a holocaust, where thousands lost everything, thousands got butchered and thousands of women were raped! 
Partition and After

India finally became free of foreign occupation after 1000 very long years. The Freedom struggle of India inspired similar struggles in many countries of Asia and Africa and the dawn of Indian independence in 1947 heralded an era of independence for many enslaved nations. Martin Luther King and President Nelson Mandela were highly influenced by the non-violent Satyagraha movement of Gandhiji and India supported the cause of freedom struggle of many countries including South Africa. 
Partition took place on midnight of August 15, 1947. Pandit Nehru, as the first Prime Minister of Free India proclaimed his 'Tryst of destiny.' Over 300 princely states were free to join either the Indian Union or Pakistan. Most of them within the Indian territories were persuaded to join the Indian Union with the persuasion of charismatic 'Iron Man' Sardar Patel. Military action had to be taken against the Muslim ruler of Hyderabad to make it part of India. Kashmir, the so called heaven on earth which is an integral part of India since time immemorial, on the other hand, presented a rather complicated problem. The ruler of Kashmir, Maharaja Hari Singh, wanted to remain independent. But Pakistan tried to seize Kashmir by force, sending in its own soldiers in the guise of Mujahid or so-called freedom fighters. India saved Kashmir from Pakistani aggression, and King Hari Singh agreed to accede to the Indian Union. However, a large part of Kashmir is still occupied by Pakistan. Jawaharlal Nehru insisted that the people of Kashmir should have a say in the merger of Kashmir into India, and so, despite the Maharaja's approval of the merger, it was delayed. The matter could not be resolved, and was taken to the United nations. Nationalist leader Shyama Prasad Mookherjee died in the jail of Kashmir while fighting the passiveness of Indian Government to make Kashmir fully integrated to India. 
A conspiracy was hatched by some powerful Muslims to hoist the Pakistani flag on the Red Fort and take hold of Delhi through the use of massive arms. The Dooms Day was set as September 6 1947. The RSS volunteers alerted Sardar Patel and Pandit Nehru, and necessary steps were taken to foil the conspiracy. 
A Constituent Assembly drafted a Constitution for the people of India which came into force from 26th January 1950. The French, like other colonies oppressed the people of Pondichery before it became integral part of India in 1954.While most of India was independent of foreign occupation by 1947, Goa, Daman and Diu was still under Portuguese domination. On 15th August of 1955 many Satyagrahis lead by Tristao Broganza entered Goa to free it. The rulers again killed many helpless unarmed people. Finally the Indian Army had to intervene and freed Goa, Daman and Diu from Portuguese yoke on 18th December, 1961. 
India's neighbor China suddenly attacked India in 1962, and took over thousands of square miles of land including that in Kashmir and the north east frontier borders. 
In 1965 Pakistan attacked India and was defeated by the brave Indian army. Pakistan again attacked India in 1971. This time they were not only defeated by the Indian army under the Prime Ministership of Indira Gandhi, but East Pakistan was freed from Pakistani rule, and a new nation, Bangla Desh was formed with the help of Indian people. Over 3 million people were tortured and killed and over 33, 000 women were raped by the Pakistani forces. Hindus were specially targeted and were attacked from house to house by the Pakistani forces. This was one of the largest genocide of this century, which is yet to be known to the people of the world. 
During the partition of the country Pakistan signed the agreement that it would make sure that the rights and the safety of the minorities would be taken proper care. But through planned activities of persecution and torture and forced conversion of minority Hindus and Christians, the number of minorities in Pakistan has gone down from 20% in 1947 to 2% in 1996. In Bangladesh, the number of minorities has gone down from 30% in 1947 to 14% in 1996. 
Pakistan is still having a proxy war in Kashmir. It is training and arming the Islamic terrorists, for which the country is paying a heavy toll. Thousands of Kashmiri Hindus are refugees in their homeland. 
Conclusion

India lives on with her world mission. India’s struggle to free herself from external forces continues. Communism, capitalism, consumerism and religious fundamentalism of Islamic and Christian missionaries are the main forces working against the unity and progress of the nation. Indian people will not forget the divisive diplomacy of Britain, which created the vivisection of the country and enmity among her people. However, reunification of the people and land in future is not an impossible dream after the fall of the Berlin Wall.

Friday, 10 May 2013

Greek Conquests in India

In ancient times, trade between India and Greece flourished with silk, spices and gold being traded. The Greeks invaded India several times, starting with the conquest of Alexander the Great.


Conquests of Alexander The Great (327-326 BCE)

In 327 BCE Alexander the Great began his foray into Punjab. King Ambhi, ruler of Taxila, surrendered the city to Alexander. Many people had fled to a high fortress/rock called Aornos. Aornos was taken by Alexander by storm after a successful siege. Alexander fought an epic battle against the Indian monarch Porus in the Battle of Hydaspes (326). After victory, Alexander made an alliance with Porus and appointed him as satrap of his own kingdom. Alexander continued on to conquer all the headwaters of the Indus River.

East of Porus' kingdom, near the Ganges River, was the powerful kingdom of Magadha. Exhausted and frightened by the prospect of facing another giant Indian army at the Ganges River, his army mutinied at the Hyphasis (modern Beas), refusing to march further East. Alexander, after the meeting with his officer, Coenus, was convinced that it was better to return.

Alexander was forced to turn south, conquering his way down the Indus to the Indian Ocean. He sent much of his army to Carmania (modern southern Iran) with his general Craterus, and commissioned a fleet to explore the Persian Gulf shore under his admiral Nearchus, while he led the rest of his forces back to Persia by the southern route through the Gedrosia (modern Makran in southern Pakistan).


Alexander left behind Greek forces which established themselves in the city of Taxila, now in Pakistan. Several generals governed the newly established province. One of them, Sophytes (305-294 BCE), was an independent Greek prince in the Punjab.

Within a few years local India monarchs recaptured the region from the Greeks. Chandragupta Maurya, who had met Alexander in Taxila, founded the Mauryan empire.


Seleucid invasion (304 BCE)

Seleucus I Nicator founder of the Seleucid dynasty and one of Alexander's former generals. He invaded India (modern Punjab in northern India and Pakistan) in 304 BCE.

It is said that Chandragupta Marya put an army of 100,000 men and 9,000 war elephants and forced Seleucus to conclude an alliance. Seleucus gave him his daughter in marriage, ceded the territories of Arachosia, and received from Chandraguta 500 war elephant which he used decisively at the Battle of Ipsus.

Seleucus also sent an ambassador named Megasthenes to Chandragupta's court, who repeatedly visited Pataliputra (modern Patna in Bihar state), capital of Chandragupta. Megasthenes has written detailed descriptions of India and Chandragupta's reign.

Continued diplomatic exchanges and good relations are between the Seleucids and the Mauryan empirors are then documented throughout the duration of the Mauryan empire.


Indo-Greek rule (180-30 BCE)

In 180 BCE, the Indo-Greeks, invaded parts of northwest and northern India. They are an extension of the Greco-Bactrian dynasty of Greek kings (the Euthydemids) located in neighbouring Bactria.

The invasion of northern India followed the destruction of the Mauryan dynasty by the general Pusyamitra Sunga, who then founded the new Indian Sunga dynasty (185 BCE-78 BCE). The Indo-Greek king Demetrius I of Bactria went as far as the capital Pataliputra in eastern India (today Patna): "Those who came after Alexander went to the Ganges and Pataliputra" (Strabo, XV.698). The Indian records also describes Greek attacks on Saketa, Panchala, Mathura and Pataliputra (Gargi-Samhita, Yuga Purana chapter).

The Indo-Greeks ruled various part of northern and northwestern India until the end of the 1st century BC, while the Sungas remained in the east.


Legacy

Buddhism flourished under the Indo-Greeks, leading to the Greco-Buddhist cultural syncretism. The arts of the Indian sub-continent were also quite affected by Hellenistic art during and after these interactions.
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Greek Conquests in India".

Tuesday, 7 May 2013

Indo-Greek Kingdom

The Indo-Greek Kingdom covered various parts of the northwest and northern Indian subcontinent from 180 BCE to around 10 CE, and was ruled by a succession of more than thirty Hellenic kings[1], often in conflict with each other. The kingdom was founded when the Greco-Bactrian king Demetrius invaded India in 180 BCE, ultimately creating an entity which seceded from the powerful Greco-Bactrian Kingdom centered in Bactria (today's northern Afghanistan). The city of Taxila in northern Pakistan would eventually serve as the Kingdom's cosmopolitan capital and seat of power.

 


During the two centuries of their rule, the Indo-Greek kings combined the Greek and Indian languages and symbols, as seen on their coins, and blended ancient Greek, Hindu and Buddhist religious practices, as seen in the archaeological remains of their cities and in the indications of their support of Buddhism. The Indo-Greek kings seem to have achieved a level of cultural syncretism with no equivalent in history, the consequences of which are still felt today, particularly through the diffusion and influence of Greco-Buddhist art.

The Indo-Greeks ultimately disappeared as a political entity around 10 CE following the invasions of the Indo-Scythian, Indo-Parthian and Kushans, although pockets of Greek populations probably remained for several centuries longer.


Greek presence in India

The Indian emperor Chandragupta, founder of the Mauryan dynasty, re-conquered around 322 BCE the northwest Indian territory that had been lost to Alexander the Great. However, contacts were kept with his Greek neighbours in the Seleucid Empire, Chandragupta received the daughter of the Seleucid king Seleucus I after a peace treaty, occupied northwestern territories as far as Arachosia, and several Greeks, such as the historian Megasthenes, resided at the Mauryan court:

"The Indians occupy [in part] some of the countries situated along the Indus, which formerly belonged to the Persians: Alexander deprived the Ariani of them, and established there settlements of his own. But Seleucus Nicator gave them to Sandrocottus in consequence of a marriage contract, and received in return five hundred elephants." Strabo 15.2.1(9) [2]

Bilingual edict (Greek and Aramaic) by king Ashoka, from Kandahar. Kabul Museum.Greek populations apparently remained in the northwest of the Indian subcontinent under Mauryan rule. Chandragupta's grandson Ashoka, who had converted to the Buddhist faith declared in the Edicts of Ashoka, set in stone, some of them written in Greek, that he converted to Buddhism Greek populations within his realm:

"Here in the king's domain among the Greeks, the Kambojas, the Nabhakas, the Nabhapamkits, the Bhojas, the Pitinikas, the Andhras and the Palidas, everywhere people are following Beloved-of-the-Gods' instructions in Dharma." Rock Edict Nb13 (S. Dhammika).
Finally, some of the emissaries of Ashoka, such as the famous Dharmaraksita, are described in Pali sources as leading Greek ("Yona") Buddhist monks, active in Buddhist proselytism (the Mahavamsa, XII[3])


The Greco-Bactrian kingdom

Alexander had established in Bactria several cities (Ai-Khanoum, Begram) and an administration that were to last more than two centuries under the Seleucids and the Greco-Bactrians, all the time in direct contact with Indian territory.

The Greco-Bactrians maintained a strong Hellenistic culture at the door of India during the rule of the Mauryan empire in India, as exemplified by the archaeological site of Ai-Khanoum. When the Mauryan empire was toppled by the Sungas around 180 BCE, the Greco-Bactrians expanded into India, where they established the Indo-Greek kingdom.


Early history

Local turmoil preceded the invasion of northern India undertaken by Demetrius, son of the Greco-Bactrian king Euthydemus, circa 180 BCE. General Pusyamitra Sunga had destroyed the ruling Mauryan King and had recently founded the Sunga dynasty (185–78 BCE). Written evidence of the initial Greek invasion survives in the Greek writings of Strabo and Justin, and in Sanskrit in the records of Patanjali, Kalidasa, and in the Yuga Purana, among others. Coins and architectural evidence also attest to the extent of the initial Greek campaign.



Evidence of the initial invasion

According to Strabo, Greek advances temporarily went as far as the Sunga capital Pataliputra (today Patna) in eastern India:
"Those who, after Alexander, advanced beyond the Hypanis, to the Ganges and Pataliputra." (Strabo, 15-1-27) 
The 1st century BCE Greek historian Apollodorus, quoted by Strabo, affirms that the Bactrian Greeks, led by Demetrius I and Menander, conquered India and occupied a larger territory than the Macedonians under Alexander the Great, going beyond the Hypanis towards the Himalayas.

The Roman historian Justin also mentioned the Indo-Greek conquests, describing Demetrius as "King of the Indians" ("Regis Indorum"), and explaining that after vanquishing him Eucratides in turn "put India under his rule" ("Indiam in potestatem redegit"). Although "India" only meant the upper Indus for Alexander the Great, since the embassies of Megasthenes in the 3rd century BCE "India" meant to the Greeks most of the northern half of the Indian subcontinent, an area roughly corresponding to the extent of the Mauryan Empire at its largest. Greek and Indian sources tend to indicate that the Greeks ruled in Pataliputra until they were forced to retreat following the coup staged by Eucratides back in Bactria circa 170 BCE, suggesting an occupation period of about eight years.

To the south, the Greeks occupied the areas of the Sindh and Gujarat down to the region of Surat (Greek: Saraostus) near Mumbai (Bombay), including the strategic harbour of Barigaza (Bharuch), as attested by several writers (Strabo 11; Periplus of the Erythraean Sea, Chap. 41/47) and as evidenced by coins dating from the Indo-Greek ruler Apollodotus I:
"The Greeks... took possession, not only of Patalena, but also, on the rest of the coast, of what is called the kingdom of Saraostus and Sigerdis." (Strabo 11.11.1)
The 1st century CE Periplus of the Erythraean Sea describes numerous Greek buildings and fortifications in Barigaza, although mistakenly attributing them to Alexander, and the circulation of Indo-Greek coinage in the region:

"The metropolis of this country is Minnagara, from which much cotton cloth is brought down to Barygaza. In these places there remain even to the present time signs of the expedition of Alexander, such as ancient shrines, walls of forts and great wells." Periplus, Chap. 41

"To the present day ancient drachmae are current in Barygaza, coming from this country, bearing inscriptions in Greek letters, and the devices of those who reigned after Alexander, Apollodorus (sic) and Menander." Periplus Chap. 47 

Indian sources
Various Indian records describe Greek (called Yavana) attacks on Mathura, Panchala, Saketa, and Pataliputra. Patanjali, a grammarian and commentator on Panini around 150 BCE, describes in the Mahabhasya, the invasion in two examples using the imperfect tense of Sanskrit, denoting a recent event:
"Arunad Yavanah Saketam" ("The Yavana [Greeks] were besieging Saketa") 
"Arunad Yavano Madhyamikam" ("The Yavana were besieging Madhyamika (the "Middle country"). 

The Anushasanaparava of the Mahabharata affirms that the country of Mathura, the heartland of India, was under the joint control of the Yavanas and the Kambojas. Accounts of battles between the Greeks and the Sunga in Central India are also found in the Malavikagnimitra, a play by Kalidasa which describes a battle between Greek forces and Vasumitra, the grandson of Pushyamitra, during the latter's reign.

Also the Brahmanical text of the Yuga Purana, which describes Indian historical events in the form of a prophecy, relates the attack of the Indo-Greeks on the capital Pataliputra, a magnificent fortified city with 570 towers and 64 gates according to Megasthenes, and describes the ultimate destruction of the city's walls:

"Then, after having approached Saketa together with the Panchalas and the Mathuras, the Yavanas, valiant in battle, will reach Kusumadhvaja ("The town of the flower-standard", Pataliputra). Then, once Puspapura (another name of Pataliputra) has been reached and its celebrated mud[-walls] cast down, all the realm will be in disorder." 

According to the Yuga Purana a situation of complete social disorder follows, in which the Yavanas rule and mingle with the people, and the position of the Brahmins and the Sudras is inverted:

"Sudras will also be utterers of bho (a form of address used towards an equal or inferior), and Brahmins will be utterers of arya (a form of address used towards a superior), and the elders, most fearful of dharma, will fearlessly exploit the people. And in the city the Yavanas, the princes, will make this people acquainted with them: but the Yavanas, infatuated by war, will not remain in Madhyadesa." (Yuga Purana, Paragraph 55-56, 2002 edition.)


Archeological remains

The city of Sirkap, today in northwestern Pakistan, was built according to the "Hippodamian" grid-plan characteristic of Greek cities, suggesting it may have been built by Demetrius. Numerous Hellenistic artifacts have been found, in particular coins of Greco-Bactrian kings and stone palettes representing Greek mythological scenes. Some of them are purely Hellenistic, others indicate an evolution of the Greco-Bactrian styles found at Ai-Khanoum towards more indianized styles. For example, accessories such as Indian ankle bracelets can be found on some representations of Greek mythological figures such as Artemis. Various Buddhist structures, such as the Butkara Stupa in the area of Swat were decorated with Hellenistic architectural elements from the 2nd century BCE.[15]

Ancient fortifications have been unearthed in Rajagriha, south of Pataliputra, which are similar in structure to the Indo-Greek fortifications of Sirkap and Barikot: stone walls connected by jutting rectangular towers, reinforced by a low structure to repel siege machinery, in contrast to the mud walls used throughout the country at that time


Retreat

The first invasion was completed by 175 BCE, as the Indo-Greeks contained the Sungas to the area eastward of Pataliputra, and established their rule on the new territory. Back in Bactria however, around 170 BCE, an usurper named Eucratides managed to topple the Euthydemid dynasty. He took for himself the title of king and started a civil war by invading the Indo-Greek territory, forcing the Indo-Greeks to retreat from their easternmost possessions and establish their new oriental frontier at Mathura, to confront this new threat:
"The Yavanas, infatuated by war, will not remain in Madhadesa (the Middle Country). There will be mutual agreement among them to leave, due to a terrible and very dreadful war having broken out in their own realm." (Yuga Purana, paragraphs 56-57, 2002 edition). 
The Hathigumpha inscription, written by the king of Kalinga, Kharavela, also describes the presence of the Greek king "Demetrius" with his army in eastern India, apparently as far as the city of Rajagriha about 70 km southeast of Pataliputra and one of the foremost Buddhist sacred cities, but claims that Demetrius ultimately retreated to Mathura on hearing of Kharavela's military successes further south:
"Then in the eighth year, (Kharavela) with a large army having sacked Goradhagiri causes pressure on Rajagaha (Rajagriha). On account of the loud report of this act of valour, the Yavana (Greek) King Dimi[ta] retreated to Mathura having extricated his demoralized army and transport." Hathigumpha inscription, in Epigraphia Indica, Vol. XX.
In any case, Eucratides seems to have occupied territory as far as the Indus, between ca 170 BCE and 150 BCE. His advances were ultimately checked by the Indo-Greek king Menander I (Milinda), previously a general of Demetrius, who asserted himself in the Indian part of the empire, apparently conquered Bactria as indicated by his issue of coins in the Greco-Bactrian style, and even began the last expansions eastwards.


Consolidation and rise of Menander I

Menander (Milinda) is considered as probably the most successful Indo-Greek king, and the conqueror of the vastest territory.[18] The finds of his coins are the most numerous and the most widespread of all the Indo-Greek kings. In Antiquity, from at least the 1st century CE, the "Menander Mons", or "Mountains of Menander", came to designate the mountain chain at the extreme east of the Indian subcontinent, today's Naga hills and Arakan, as indicated in the Ptolemy world map of the 1st century CE geographer Ptolemy. Presumably the "Menander Mons" were so named because they marked the easternmost extent of his Indian conquests. Menander is also remembered in Buddhist literature (the Milinda Panha) as a convert to Buddhism: he became an arhat whose relics were enshrined in a manner reminiscent of the Buddha. He also introduced a new coin type, with Athena Alkidemos ("Protector of the people") on the reverse, which was adopted by most of his successors in the East.

Conquests east of the Punjab region were most likely made during the second half of the century by the king Menander I.

Following Menander's reign, about twenty Indo-Greek kings are known to have ruled in succession in the eastern parts of the Indo-Greek territory. Upon his death, Menander was succeeded by his queen Agathokleia, who for some time acted as regent to their son Strato I.


Culture

Buddhism flourished under the Indo-Greek kings, and it has been suggested, although direct evidence is lacking, that their invasion of India was intended to show their support for the Mauryan empire, which had a long history of marital alliances, treaties of friendship, and exchange of ambassadors and religious emissaries with the Greeks, and to protect the Buddhist faith from the religious persecutions of the Sungas. The city of Sirkap founded by Demetrius combines Greek and Indian influences without signs of segregation between the two cultures.

The first Greek coins to be minted in India, those of Menander I and Appolodotus I bear the mention "Saviour king" (BASILEOS SOTHROS), a title with high value in the Greek world which indicated an important deflective victory. For instance, Ptolemy I had been Soter (saviour) because he had helped save Rhodes from Demetrius the Besieger, and Antiochus I because he had saved Asia Minor from the Gauls.

Also, most of the coins of the Greek kings in India were bilingual, written in Greek on the front and in Pali (in the Kharoshthi script) on the back, a tremendous concession to another culture never before made in the Hellenic world. From the reign of Apollodotus II, around 80 BCE, Kharoshthi letters started to be used as mintmarks on coins in combination with Greek monograms and mintmarks, suggesting the participation of local technicians to the minting process. Incidentally, these bilingual coins of the Indo-Greeks were the key in the decipherment of the Kharoshthi script by James Prinsep (1799-1840). Kharoshthi became extinct around the 3rd century CE.

In Indian literature, the Indo-Greeks are described as Yavanas (transliteration of "Ionians"). Direct epigraphical evidence involves the Indo-Greek kings, such as the mention of the "Yavana king" Antialcidas on the Heliodorus pillar in Vidisha, or the mention of Menander I in the Buddhist text of the Milinda Panha. In the Harivamsa the "Yavana" Indo-Greeks are qualified, together with the Sakas, Kambojas, Pahlavas and Paradas as Kshatriya-pungava i.e foremost among the Warrior caste, or Kshatriyas. The Majjhima Nikaya explains that in the lands of the Yavanas and Kambojas, in contrast with the numerous Indian castes, there were only two classes of people, Aryas and Dasas (masters and slaves). The Arya could become Dasa and vice versa.


Religion

In addition to the worship of the Classical pantheon of the Greek deities found on their coins (Zeus, Herakles, Athena, Apollo...), the Indo-Greeks were involved with local faiths, particularly with Buddhism, but also with Hinduism and Zoroastrianism.


Buddhism

The Edicts of Ashoka, inscribed during the reign of the Indian emperor Ashoka (273-232 BCE), claim that the Greek populations of the northwestern Indian subcontinent (in today's Afghanistan and ancient Gandhara) had already welcomed Buddhism by around 250 BCE:

"Here in the king's domain among the Greeks, the Kambojas, the Nabhakas, the Nabhapamkits, the Bhojas, the Pitinikas, the Andhras and the Palidas, everywhere people are following Beloved-of-the-Gods' instructions in Dharma. (Edicts of Ashoka, 13th Rock Edict, S. Dhammika).
After the Greco-Bactrians militarily occupied parts of northern India from around 180 BCE, numerous instances of interaction between Greeks and Buddhism are recorded.


The conversion of Menander

Menander I, one of the most famous successors of Demetrius, ruled from 150 to 135 BCE. He is presented by Greek authors as an even greater conqueror than Alexander the Great. Strabo (XI.II.I) says Menander was one of the two Bactrian kings who extended their power farthest into India.

Menander, the "Saviour king", seems to have converted to Buddhism, and is described in Buddhist texts as a great benefactor of the religion, on a par with Ashoka or the future Kushan emperor Kanishka. He is famous for his dialogues with the Buddhist monk Nagasena, transmitted to us in the Milinda Panha, which explain that he became a Buddhist arhat:
"And afterwards, taking delight in the wisdom of the Elder, he handed over his kingdom to his son, and abandoning the household life for the house-less state, grew great in insight, and himself attained to Arahatship!" (The Questions of King Milinda, Translation by T. W. Rhys Davids) 
Plutarch also presents Menander as an example of benevolent rule, and explains that upon his death, the honour of sharing his remains was claimed by the various cities under his rule, and they were enshrined in "monuments" (probably stupas), in a parallel with the historic Buddha:

"But when one Menander, who had reigned graciously over the Bactrians, died afterwards in the camp, the cities indeed by common consent celebrated his funerals; but coming to a contest about his relics, they were difficultly at last brought to this agreement, that his ashes being distributed, everyone should carry away an equal share, and they should all erect monuments to him." (Plutarch, "Political Precepts" Praec. reip. ger. 28, 6).


Buddhist proselytism
During the reign of Menander, the Greek (Pali: Yona, lit: "Ionian") Buddhist monk Mahadhammarakkhita (Sanskrit: Mahadharmaraksita, lit. "Great protector of the Dharma") is said to have come from Alasandra (thought to be Alexandria of the Caucasus, the city founded by Alexander the Great, near today's Kabul) with 30,000 monks for the foundation ceremony of the Maha Thupa ("Great stupa") built by king Dutthagamani at Anuradhapura in Sri Lanka, indicating the importance of Buddhism within Greek communities in northwestern India, and the prominent role Greek Buddhist monks played in them:
"From Alasanda the city of the Yonas came the thera (elder) Yona Mahadhammarakkhita with thirty thousand bhikkhus." (Mahavamsa, XXIX)
Several Buddhist dedications by Greeks in India are recorded, such as that of the Greek meridarch (civil governor of a province) named Theodorus, describing in Kharoshthi how he enshrined relics of the Buddha. The inscriptions were found on a vase inside a stupa, dated to the reign of Menander or one his successors in the 1st century BCE (Tarn, p391):

"Theudorena meridarkhena pratithavida ime sarira sakamunisa bhagavato bahu-jana-stitiye":

"The meridarch Theodorus has enshrined relics of Lord Shakyamuni, for the welfare of the mass of the people" 

(Swat relic vase inscription of the Meridarkh Theodoros)
Although the spread of Buddhism to Central Asia and Northern Asia is usually associated with the Kushans, a century or two later, there is a possibility that it may have been introduced in those areas from Gandhara "even earlier, during the time of Demetrius and Menander" (Puri, "Buddhism in Central Asia"). There is however some textual evidence to suggest that Buddhism had penetrated much earlier to Central Asia, at least in a limited form: the first two disciples of the Buddha were named Tapassu and Bhallika, from the region of Balhika (the present Balkh, and Sanskrit for Bactria), and though it cannot necessarilly be presumed that any extensive prosyletization occurred on their return journey, that the Sanskrit name for Bactria derived from the name of a Bactrian-Buddhist disciple is suggestive of some early influence. Bhallika and Tapassu were both travellers, and if nothing else, the story of their conversion and their home region's Sanskrit nomenclature illustrates the possibility of early transmission via the local trade routes.


Buddhist symbolism

From around 180 BCE, Agathocles and Pantaleon, probable successors to Demetrius I in the Paropamisadae, and the earliest Greek kings to issue Indian-standard square bilingual coins (in Brahmi), depicted the Buddhist lion together with the Hindu goddess Lakshmi.

Some coins of Agathocles in the Indian standard also show a six-arched stupa and a tree in a railing, typical symbol of the Bodhi tree in early Buddhism [26]. These coins show an unprecedented willingness to adapt to every aspect of the local culture: shape of the coinage, coinage size, language, and religion.

Later, some Indo-Greek coins incorporate the Buddhist symbol of the eight-spoked wheel, such as those of Menander I, as well as his possible grandson Menander II. On these coins, the wheel is associated with the Greek symbols of victory, either the palm of victory, or the victory wreath handed over by the goddess Nike. This symbology has led some to conclude that Menander adopted the Buddhist mantle of a "Chakravartin" during his lifetime; lit., "one for whom the wheel of law turns," translated as "King of the Wheel" in Western texts.

The ubiquitous symbol of the elephant may or may not have been associated with Buddhism. Interestingly, on some coin series of Antialcidas, the elephant holds the same relationship to Zeus and Nike as the Buddhist wheel on the coin of Menander II, tending to suggest a common meaning for both symbols. Some of the earlier coins of king Apollodotus I directly associate the elephant with Buddhist symbolism, such as the stupa hill surmounted by a star, also seen, for example on the coins of the Mauryan Empire or those of the later Kuninda kingdom.
Conversely, the bull is probably associated with Shiva, and often described in an erectile state as on the coins of Apollodotus I.

Also, after the reign of Menander I, several Indo-Greek rulers, such as Agathokleia, Amyntas, Nicias, Peukolaos, Hermaeus, Hippostratos and Menander II, depicted themselves or their Greek deities forming with the right hand a symbolic gesture identical to the Buddhist vitarka mudra (thumb and index joined together, with other fingers extended), which in Buddhism signifies the transmission of the Buddha's teaching.

At precisely the same time, right after the death of Menander, several Indo-Greek rulers also started to adopt on their coins the Pali title of "Dharmikasa", meaning "follower of the Dharma" (the title of the great Indian Buddhist king Ashoka was Dharmaraja "King of the Dharma").[27] This usage was adopted by Strato I, Zoilos I, Heliokles II, Theophilos, Peukolaos, Menander II and Archebios.

Altogether, the conversion of Menander I to Buddhism suggested by the Milinda Panha seems to have triggered the use of Buddhist symbolism in one form or another on the coinage of close to half of the kings who succeeded him. Especially, all the kings after Menander who are recorded to have ruled in Gandhara (apart from the little known Demetrius III) display Buddhist symbolism in one form or another. On the contrary, none of the kings whose rule was limited to Punjab did display Buddhist signs (with the exception of the powerful Hippostratos, who probably took under his protection many Gandharan Greeks fleeing from the Indo-Scythians (Tarn).).

A 2nd century BCE relief from a Buddhist stupa in Bharhut, in eastern Madhya Pradesh (today at the Indian Museum in Calcutta), represents a foreign soldier with the curly hair of a Greek and the royal headband with flowing ends of a Greek king. In his left hand, he hold a branch of ivy, symbol of Dionysos. Also parts of his dress, with rows of geometrical folds, are characteristically Hellenistic in style. On his sword appears the Buddhist symbol of the three jewels, or Triratana.


Representation of the Buddha
The anthropomorphic representation of the Buddha is absent from Indo-Greek coinage, suggesting that the Indo-Greek kings may have respected the Indian aniconic rule for Buddhist depictions, limiting themselves to Buddhist symbolism only. Consistently with this perspective, the actual depiction of the Buddha would be a later phenomenon, usually dated to the 1st century CE, emerging from the sponsorship of the syncretic Kushan Empire and executed by Greek, and, later, Indian and possibly Roman artists. Datation of Greco-Buddhist statues is generally uncertain, but they are at least firmly established from the 1st century CE.

Another possibility is that the Indo-Greeks may not have considered the Buddha strictly as a God, but rather as an essentially human sage or philosopher, in line with the traditional Nikaya Buddhist doctrine. Just as philosophers were routinely represented in statues (but certainly not on coins) in Antiquity, the Indo-Greek may have initiated anthropomorphic representations of the Buddha in statuary only, possibly as soon as the 2nd-1st century BCE, as advocated by Foucher and suggested by Chinese murals depicting Emperor Wu of Han worshipping Buddha statues brought from Central Asia in 120 BCE (See picture). Foucher especially considered Hellenistic free-standing Buddhas as "the most beautiful, and probably the most ancient of the Buddhas", assigning them to the 1st century BCE, and making them the starting point of the anthropomorphic representations of the Buddha.[28]

The willingness of ancient Greeks to represent local deities is also attested in Egypt with the creation of the god Serapis in Hellenistic style, an adaptation of the Egyptian god Apis. An Indo-Chinese tradition also explains that Nagasena, also known as Menander's Buddhist teacher, created in 43 BCE in the city of Pataliputra a statue of the Buddha, the Emerald Buddha, which was later brought to Thailand.

Stylistically, Indo-Greek coins generally display a very high level of Hellenistic artistic realism, which declined drastically around 50 BCE with the invasions of the Indo-Scythians, Yuezhi and Indo-Parthians. The first known statues of the Buddha are also very realistic and Hellenistic in style and are more consistent with the pre-50 BCE artistic level seen on coins. This would tend to suggest that the first statues were created between 130 BCE (death of Menander) and 50 BCE, precisely at the time when Buddhist symbolism appeared on Indo-Greek coinage. From that time, Menander and his successors may have been the key propagators of Buddhist ideas and representations: "the spread of Gandhari Buddhism may have been stimulated by Menander's royal patronage, as may have the development and spread of Gandharan sculpture, which seems to have accompanied it" (Mc Evilly, "The shape of ancient thought", p378)

The representation of the Buddha may also be connected to his progressive deification, which is usually associated with the spread of the Indian principle of Bhakti (personal devotion to a deity). Bhakti is a principle which evolved in the Bhagavata religious movement, and is said to have permeated Buddhism from about 100 BCE, and to have been a contributing factor to the representation of the Buddha in human form. The association of the Indo-Greeks with the Bhagavata movement is documented in the inscription of the Heliodorus pillar, made during the reign of the Indo-Greek king Antialcidas (r.c. 115-95 BCE). At that time relations with the Sungas seem to have improved, and some level of religious exchange seems to have occurred. The point of time when bhakti fervour would have encountered the Hellenistic artistic tradition would then be around 100 BCE.

Most of the early images of the Buddha (especially those of the standing Buddha) are anepigraphic, which makes it difficult to have a definite datation. The earliest known image of the Buddha with approximate indications on date is the Bimaran casket, which has been found buried with coins of the Indo-Scythian king Azes II (or possibly Azes I), indicating a 30-10 BCE date,[29] although this date is not undisputed. Such datation, as well as the general Hellenistic style and attitude of the Buddha on the Bimaran casket (himation dress, contrapposto attitude, general depiction) would made it a possible Indo-Greek work, used in dedications by Indo-Scythians right after the end of Indo-Greek rule in the area of Gandhara. Since it already displays quite a sophisticated iconography (Brahma and Sakra as attendants, Bodhisattvas) in an advanced style, it would suggest much earlier representations of the Buddha were already current by that time, going back to the rule of the Indo-Greeks (Alfred A. Foucher and others).


Hinduism

The first known bilingual coins of the Indo-Greeks were issued by Agathocles around 180 BCE. These coins were found in Ai-Khanoum, the great Greco-Bactrian city in northeastern Afghanistan, but introduce for the first time an Indian script (the Brahmi script which had been in use under the Mauryan empire), and the first known representations of Hindu deities, in a very Indian iconography: Krishna-Vasudeva, with his large wheel with six spokes (chakra) and conch (shanka), and his brother Sankarshan-Balarama, with his plough (hala) and pestle (masala), both early avatars of Vishnu.[30] The square coins, instead of the usual Greek round coins, also followed the Indian standard for coinage. The dancing girls on some of the coins of Agathocles and Pantaleon are also sometimes considered as representations of Subhadra, Krishna's sister.

These first issues were in several respects a short-lived experiment. Hindu anthropomorphic deities were never again represented in Indo-Greek coinage (although the bull on the vast quantity of subsequent coins may have symbolized Shiva, as the elephant may have symbolized Buddhism), and the Brahmi script was immediately replaced by the Kharoshti script, derived from Aramaic. The general practice however of minting bilingual coins and combining Greek and Indian iconography, sometimes in the Greek and sometimes in the Indian standard continued for the next two centuries.

In any case, these coins suggest the strong presence of Indian religious traditions in the northwestern Indian subcontinent at that time, and the willingness of the Greeks to acknowledge and even promote them. Artistically, they tend to indicate that the Greeks were not particularly reluctant to make representations of local deities, which has some bearing on the later emergence of the image of the Buddha in Hellenistic style.

The Heliodorus pillar inscription is another epigraphical evidence of the interaction between Greeks and Hinduism. The pillar was erected around 110 BCE in central India at the site of Vidisha, by Heliodorus, a Greek ambassador of the Indo-Greek king Antialcidas to the court of the Sunga king Bhagabhadra. The pillar was surmounted by a sculpture of Garuda and was apparently dedicated by Heliodorus to the temple of Vasudeva.


Zoroastrianism

Persian culture and religion seem to have been rather influential among the Western Indo-Greeks, who, located around the Paropamisadae, lived in direct contact with the Central Asian cultural sphere and the eastern reaches of the Parthian empire. Images of the Persian Zoroastrian god Mithra appear extensively on the Indo-Greek coinage of the Western kings, as a god with a radiated phrygian cap.


This Zeus-Mithra god is also the one represented seated (with the rays around the head, and a small protrusion on the top of the head representing the cap) on many coins of Hermaeus, Antialcidas or Heliokles II, or possibly even earlier during the time of Eucratides I, on whose coins the deity is said to be the god of the city of Kapisa.

The future Buddha Maitreya, usually represented seated on a throne Western-style, and venerated both in Mahayana and non-Mahayana Buddhism, is sometimes considered as influenced by the god Mithra. "Some scholars suggest he (Maitreya) was originally linked to the Iranian saviour-figure Mitra, and that his later importance for Buddhist as the future Buddha residing in the Tusita heaven, who will follow on from Sakyamuni Buddha, derives from this source." (Keown, Dictionary of Buddhism)
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Indo-Greek Kingdom".

Thursday, 18 April 2013

Islamic conquest in India

The Islamic conquest of the Indian subcontinent took place during the ascendancy of the Rajput Kingdoms in North India, during the seventh to the twelfth centuries. The first incursion by the new Muslim successor states of the Persian empire occurred around 664 CE during the Umayyad Caliphate, led by Mohalib towards Multan in Southern Punjab; in modern day Pakistan. Mohalib expeditions were not aimed at conquest, though they penetrated as far as the capital of the Maili and returned with wealth and prisoners of war.



It took several centuries for Islam to spread to parts of India and is a topic of intense debate. Some quarters hold that Hindus were forcibly converted to Islam by laws favoring Muslims Citizens, and threat of naked force; the "Conversion by the Sword Theory." Others hold that this occurred by inter-marriage, conversions, economic integration, to escape caste structures or at the hand of Sufi preachers. The disputers of the "Conversion by the Sword Theory" point to the prescence of the strong Muslim communities found in Southern India, modern day Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Western Burma, Indonesia and Philippines coupled with the distinctively lack of equivalent Muslim communities around the heartland of historical Muslim Empires in the Indian Sub-Continent as refutation to the Conversion by Sword Theory.

Historian Will Durant wrote in The Story of Civilization (1972) that the Muslim conquest of India was "probably the bloodiest story in history." The number of people killed is estimated based on the Muslim chronicles and demographic calculations. K.S. Lal estimated in his book The Growth of Muslim Population in India that between 1000 CE and 1500 CE, the population of Hindus decreased by 80 million. The legacy of Islamic conquest of South Asia is a hotly debated issue even today.


Early Islamic Communities


Several reasons existed for the desire of the rising Islamic Empire to gain a foothold in Makran and Sind; ranging from the participation of armies from Sindh fighting alongside the Persians in battles such as Nehawand, Salasal, Qadisia and Makran, pirate raids on Arab shipping to the granting of refuge to rebel chiefs.

The Punjab and Sind region had also been historically under considerable flux as Central Asian Kingdoms, the Persian Empire, Buddhist Kingdoms and Rajput Kingdoms vied for control prior to the arrival of the Islamic influence.

Islam in India existed in communities along the Arab trade routes in Sindh, Ceylon and Southern India.


Muhammad bin Qasim

In 711, the Umayyad Caliph in Damascus sent two failed expeditions to Baluchistan (an arid region on the Iranian Plateau in Southwest Asia, presently split between Iran, Afghanistan, and Pakistan) and Sindh (presently a province of Pakistan bordering on Baluchistan, Punjab, and Rajasthan, India).

The nature of the expeditions was punitive, and in response to raids carried out by pirates on Arab shipping, operating around Daibul. The allegation was made that the King of Sindh, Raja Dahir was the patron of these pirates. The third expedition was led by a 20-year-old Syrian chieftain named Muhammad bin Qasim. The expedition went as far North as Multan, then called the "City of Gold," that contained the extremely large Hindu temple Sun Mandir.

Bin Qasim invaded the sub-continent at the orders of Al-Hajjaj bin Yousef, the governor of Iraq. Qasim's armies defeated Raja Dahir at what is now Hyderabad in Sindh in 712. He then proceeded to subdue the lands from Karachi to Multan with an initial force of only six thousand Syrian tribesmen; therby establishing the dominion of the Umayyad Caliphate from Lisbon in Portugal to the Indus Valley. Qasim's stay was brief as he was soon recalled to Baghdad, and the Caliphates rule in South Asia shrank to Sindh and Southern Punjab.


Communities in the North-West


Subsequent to Qasim's recall the Caliphates control in Sindh was extremely weak under governors who only nominally acknowledging Arab control and shared power to coexisting with local Hindu, Jain and Buddhist rulers. Ismaili missionaries found a receptive audience among both the Sunni and non-Muslim populations here. In 985 a group around Multan declared themselves an independent Ismaili Fatimid State.

Coastal trade and the presence of a colony in Sindh permitted significant cultural exchange and the introduction of Islamic teachers into the subcontinent. Considerable conversions took place, especially amongst the Buddhist majority. Multan became a center of the Ismaili sect of Islam, which still has many adherents in Sindh today. This region under generous patronage of the arts provided a conduit for Arab scholars to absorb and expand on Indian sciences and pass them onwards to the West.

North of Multan non-Muslim groups remained numerous. From this period, the conquered area was divided into two parts: the Northern region comprising the Punjab remained under the control of Hindu Rajas, while the Southern coastal areas comprising of Baluchistan, Sindh, and Multan came under Muslim control.


Ghaznavid Period


Under Sabuktigin, Ghazni found itself in conflict with the Shahi Raja Jayapala. When Sabuktigin died and his son Mahmud ascended the throne in 998, Ghazni was engaged in the North with the Qarakhanids when the Shahi Raja renewed hostilities.

In the early 11th century Mahmud of Ghazni launched 17 expeditions into the Indian sub-continent. In 1001, Sultan Mahmud Ghaznavi defeated Raja Jayapala of the Hindu Shahi Dynasty of Gandhara and marched further into Peshawar and in 1005 made it the center for his forces.

The Ghaznavid Jihads were initially directed against the Ismaili Fatimids in on-going struggle of the Abbassid Caliphate elsewhere. However, once this aim was accomplished he moved onto richness of the loot of wealthy temples and monastaries. By 1027, Mahmud had captured most of Northern India and obtained formal recognition of Ghazni's sovreignity from the Abbassid Khalifah, al-Qadir Billah.

Ghaznavid rule in North India lasted over 175 years, from 1010 to 1187. It was during this period that Lahore assumed considerable importance apart from being the second capital, and later the only capital, of the Ghaznavid Empire.

At the end of his reign, Mahmud's empire extended from Kurdistan in the west to Samarkand in the Northeast, and from the Caspian Sea to the Yamuna. Although his raids carried his forces across Northern and Western India, only Punjab came under his permanent rule; Kashmir, the Doab, Rajasthan, and Gujarat remained under the control of the local Rajput dynasties.

In 1030, Mahmud fell gravely ill and died at age 59. He had been a gifted military commander, and during his rule, universities were founded to study various subjects such as mathematics, religion, the humanities, and medicine. Sunni Islam was the main religion of his kingdom and the Perso-Afghan dialect Dari was made the official language.

As with the Turkic invaders of three centuries ago, Mahmud's armies looted temples in Varanasi, Mathura, Ujjain, Maheshwar, Jwalamukhi, and Dwarka. Mahmud was quite pragmatic and he even utlized uncoverted Hindu generals and troops in his expeditions. His main target remained the Shiites and Buyid Iran. There is considerable evidence from writings of Al-Biruni, Sogidan, Uyghur and Manichean texts that the Buddhists, Hindus and Jains were accepted as People of the Book and references to Buddha as Burxan or a prophet can be found. After the initial destruction and pillage Buddhists, Jains and Hindus were granted protected subject status as dhimmis.


Muhammed Ghuri


Muhammad Ghori was a Turkic-Afghan conqueror from the region of Ghor in Afghanistan. Before 1160, the Ghaznavid Empire covered an area running from central Afghanistan east to the Punjab, with capitals at Ghazni on the banks of Ghazni river in present-day Afghanistan, and at Lahore in present-day Pakistan. In 1160, the Ghorids conquered Ghazni from the Ghaznevids, and in 1173 Muhammad was made governor of Ghazni. He raided eastwards into the remaining Ghaznevid territory, and invaded Gujarat in the 1180s but was rebuffed by Gujarat's Solanki rulers. In 1186 and 1187 he conquered Lahore in alliance with a local hindu ruler, ending the Ghaznevid empire and bringing the last of Ghaznevid territory under his control, and seemed to be the first Muslim ruler seriously interested in expanding his domain in the sub-continent, and like his predecessor Mahmud initially started off against the Ismaili Shiite kingdom that had regained independence during the Nizari conflicts, and then onto booty and power.

In 1191, he invaded the territory of Prithviraj III of Ajmer, who ruled much of present-day Rajasthan and Haryana, but was defeated at Tarain by Govinda-Raja of Delhi, Prithviraj's vassal. The following year, Muhammad assembled 120,000 horsemen and once again invaded the Kingdom of Ajmer. Muhammad's army met Prithviraj's army again at Tarain, and this time Muhammad won; Govinda-Raja was slain, Prithviraj captured and Muhammad advanced onto Delhi. Within a year, Muhammad controlled Northern Rajasthan and Northern Ganges-Yamuna Doab. After these victories in India, and Muhammad's establishment of a capital in Delhi, Multan was also incorporated into his empire. Muhammad then returned east to Ghazni to deal with the threat on his eastern frontiers from the Turks and Mongols, whiles his armies continued to advance through Northern India, raiding as far east as Bengal.

Muhammad returned to Lahore after 1200 to deal with a revolt of the Ghakkar tribe in the Punjab. He suppressed the revolt, but was killed during a Ghakkar raid on his camp on the Jhelum River in 1206. Upon his death his most capable general, Qutb-ud-din Aybak, took control of Muhammad's Indian conquests and declared himself the first Sultan of Delhi.

The Delhi Sultanate

Muhammad's successors established the first dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate, while the Mamluk Dynasty in 1211 (however, the Delhi Sultanate is traditionally held to have been founded in 1206) seized the reins of the empire. Mamluk means "slave" and referred to the Turkic slave soldiers who became rulers. The territory under control of the Muslim rulers in Delhi expanded rapidly. By mid-century, Bengal and much of central India was under the Delhi Sultanate. Several Turko-Afghan dynasties ruled from Delhi: the Mamluk (1211–1290), the Khalji (1290–1320), the Tughlaq (1320–1413), the Sayyid (1414–51), and the Lodhi (1451–1526). Muslim Kings extended their domains into Southern India, Kingdom of Vijayanagar resisted until falling to the Deccan Sultanate in 1565. Certain kingdoms remained independent of Delhi such as the larger kingoms of Rajasthan, parts of the Deccan, Gujarat, Malwa (central India), and Bengal, nevertheless all of the area in present-day Pakistan came under the rule of Delhi.

The Sultans of Delhi enjoyed cordial, if superficial, relations with Muslim rulers in the Near East but owed them no allegiance. They based their laws on the Quran and the sharia and permitted non-Muslim subjects to practice their religion only if they paid the jizya (head tax). They ruled from urban centers, while military camps and trading posts provided the nuclei for towns that sprang up in the countryside.

Perhaps the greatest contribution of the Sultanate was its temporary success in insulating the subcontinent from the potential devastation of the Mongol invasion from Central Asia in the 13th century, which nonetheless led to the capture of Afghanistan and western Pakistan by the Mongols (see the Ilkhanate Dynasty). The Sultanate ushered in a period of Indian cultural renaissance, The resulting "Indo-Muslim" fusion left lasting monuments in architecture, music, literature, and religion. In addition it is surmised that the language of Urdu (literally meaning "horde" or "camp" in various Turkic dialects) was born during the Dehli Sultanate period as a result of the mingling of Sanskritic Hindi and the Persian, Turkish, Arabic favored by the Muslim invaders of India.

The Sultanate suffered from the sacking of Delhi in 1398 by Timur (Tamerlane) but revived briefly under the Lodhis before it was conquered by the Mughals in 1526, who ruled from the sixteenth to the eighteenth centuries.

Alauddin Khilji

Other invasions from Central Asia followed his on a regular basis, such as that of Muhammad Khilji, who burned Nalanda, a major Buddhist library. The rulers of these territories became known as the Mughals and their empire as the Mughal Empire.

The Khilji Dynasty is not affiliated politically with the Mughal Dynasty, which started in the 1500s under Babur.


The Mughal Empire

India in the 16th century presented a fragmented picture of rulers, both Muslim and Hindu, who lacked concern for their subjects and failed to create a common body of laws or institutions. Outside developments also played a role in shaping events. The circumnavigation of Africa by the Portuguese explorer Vasco da Gama in 1498 allowed Europeans to challenge Arab control of the trading routes between Europe and Asia. In Central Asia and Afghanistan, shifts in power pushed Babur of Ferghana (in present-day Uzbekistan) southward, first to Kabul and then to India. The dynasty he founded endured for more than three centuries.


Babur

Claiming descent from both Genghis Khan and Timur, Babur combined strength and courage with a love of beauty, and military ability with cultivation. He concentrated on gaining control of Northwestern India, doing so in 1526 by defeating the last Lodhi Sultan at the First battle of Panipat, a town north of Delhi. Babur then turned to the tasks of persuading his Central Asian followers to stay on in India and of overcoming other contenders for power, mainly the Rajputs and the Afghans. He succeeded in both tasks but died shortly thereafter in 1530. The Mughal Empire was one of the largest centralized states in premodern history and was the precursor to the British Indian Empire.

Babur was followed by his great-grandson, Shah Jahan (r. 1628–58), builder of the Taj Mahal and other magnificent buildings. Two other towering figures of the Mughal era were Akbar (r. 1556–1605) and Aurangzeb (r. 1658–1707). Both rulers expanded the empire greatly and were able administrators. However, Akbar was known for his religious tolerance and administrative genius while Aurangzeb was a pious Muslim and fierce advocate of more orthodox Islam.

Aurangzeb

While some rulers were zealous in their spread of Islam, others were relatively liberal. Moghul emperor Akbar was relatively liberal and established a new religion, Din E Elahi, which included beliefs from different religions. He abolished the jizya for some time. In contrast, his great-grandson Aurangazeb was more zealous and, generally, during his term non-Muslims suffered. He reimposed the jizya, and it is historically recorded that under his rule a large number of natives were put to death.

In the century-and-a-half that followed the death of Aurangzeb, effective Muslim control weakened. Succession to imperial and even provincial power, which had often become hereditary, was subject to intrigue and force. The mansabdari system gave way to the zamindari system, in which high-ranking officials took on the appearance of hereditary landed aristocracy with powers of collecting rents. As Delhi's control waned, other contenders for power emerged and clashed, thus preparing the way for the eventual British takeover.


Ahmad Shah Abdali

Decay of the Mughal power saw a series of invasions by the Persian adventurer, Nadir Shah, but no occupation per se. Following his death (something his Royal Guardsman Abdali might have contributed to), Ahmed Shah Abdali - a Pathan - decided to try his luck closer to home. The fertile Punjab was the nearest and easiest prey. A long and brutal occupation of the Punjab - reviled by Sikhs, Hindus and Punjabi Muslims - lasted till the rise of the Sikh Empire.


Iconoclasm
Nalanda

In 1193, the Nalanda University complex was destroyed by Turkish Muslim invaders under Bakhtiyar Khalji; this event is seen as the final milestone in the decline and near extinction of Buddhism in India. He also burned Nalanda's a major Buddhist library and Vikramshila University, as well as numerous Bhuddhist monasteries in India. When the Tibetan translator, Chag Lotsawa Dharmasvamin (Chag Lo-tsa-ba, 1197 - 1264), visited northern India in 1235, Nalanda was damaged, looted, and largely deserted, but still standing and functioning with seventy students. Mahabodhi, Sompura, Vajrasan and other important monastaries were found to be untouched. The Ghuri ravages only afflicted those monastaries that lay in the direct of their advance and were fortified in the manner of defensive forts.

By the end of the 12th century, following the Islamic conquest of the Buddhist stronghold in Bihar, Buddhism declined as survivors retreated to Nepal, Sikkim and Tibet or escaped to the South of the sub-continent. Hinduism and Jainism survived because they did not have large centers of worship and devotion based around heavily fortified monastaries. Furthermore, many buddhist also converted for social mobility from their status as lower castes in the hindu view. Under the tutelage of various scholars fleeing the ravages of the Mongols, and with a historically extensive familiarity with buddhists in Central Asia many impoverished peasants in East Bengal converted.


Vijayanagara

The city flourished between the 14th century and 16th century, during the height of the Vijayanagar Empire. During this time, it was often in conflict with the kingdoms which rose in the Northern Deccan, and which are often collectively termed the Deccan Sultanates. In 1565, the empire's armies suffered a massive and catastrophic defeat at by an alliance of the Sultanates, and the capital was taken. The victorious armies then razed, depopulated and destroyed the city over several months. The empire continued in slow decline, but the original capital was not reoccupied or rebuilt.


Somnath

The first temple of Somnath is said to have existed before the beginning of the Christian era. The second temple, built by the Maitraka kings of Vallabhi in Gujarat, replaced the first one on the same site around 649. In 725 Junayad, the Arab governor of Sind, sent his armies to destroy the second temple. The Pratihara king Nagabhata II constructed the third temple in 815, a large structure of red sandstone. Mahmud of Ghazni attacked this temple in 1026, looted its gems and precious stones, massacred the worshippers and burned it. It was then that the famous Shivalinga of the temple was entirely destroyed. The fourth temple was built by the Paramara King Bhoj of Malwa and the Solanki king Bhima of Gujarat (Anhilwara) between 1026 and 1042. The temple was razed in 1297 when the Sultanate of Delhi conquered Gujarat, and again in 1394. Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb destroyed the temple again in 1706.


Historical Views

French historian Alain Danielou wrote in his book Histoire de l'Inde:
From the moment when the Muslims arrive in India, the history of India does not have any more great interest. It is long and monotonous series of murder, massacres, spoilations, destruction. 
French Historian Gustave Le Bon wrote in his book Les Civilisations de L'Inde:
There does not exist a history of ancient India. Their books contain no historical data whatever, except for a few religious books in which historical information is buried under a heap of parables and folk-lore, and their buildings and other monuments also do nothing to fill the void for the oldest among them do not go beyond the third century B.C. To discover facts about India of the ancient times is as difficult a task as the discovery of the island of Atlantis, which, according to Plato, was destroyed due to the changes of the earth... The historical phase of India began with the Muslim invasion. Muslims were India's first historians. 
Historian Will Durant wrote his book The Story of Civilization:
The Mohammadan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precarious thing, whose delicate complex of order and liberty, culture and peace may at any time be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within.
Hindu sage Padmanabha described in his KanhaDade Prabandha in 1456 AD the story of the Islamic invasion of Gujarat of 1298 AD:

The conquering army burnt villages, devastated the land, plundered people’s wealth, took Brahmins and children and women of all classes captive, flogged with thongs of raw hide, carried a moving prison with it, and converted the prisoners into obsequious slaves.

Tarikh-i-Yamini of Utbi the sultan's secretary wrote in the 11th century:
The blood of the infidels flowed so copiously at Thanesar that the stream was discoloured, notwithstanding its purity, and people were unable to drink it. The Sultan returned with plunder which is impossible to count. 

M. K. Gandhi said about the spread of Islam in the 7th century Arabia:
...I became more than ever convinced that it was not the sword that won a place for Islam in those days in the scheme of life. It was the rigid simplicity, the utter self-effacement of the prophet, the scrupulous regard for his pledges, his intense devotion to his friends and followers, his intrepidity, his fearlessness, his absolute trust in God and his own mission. These, and not the sword carried everything before them and surmounted every trouble. YOUNG INDIA, 1924 

Renowned Arabist De Lacy O'Leary:
History makes it clear however, that the legend of fanatical Muslim, sweeping through the world and forcing Islam at the point of sword upon conquered races is one of the most fantastically absurd myths that historians have ever repeated. ISLAM AT CROSSROADS, London, 1923, p. 8 

Cultural Influence

The divide and rule policies, two-nation theory and subsequent partition of India in the wake of Independence from the British Empire has polarized the sub-continental psyche making objective assesment hard in comparison to the other numerous of the settled agricultural societies of India from the North West. Islamic rule differed from these others in the level of assimilation and syncretism that occurred. The retained their identity and introduced legal and administrative systems that superseded existing systems of social conduct and ethics. While this was a source of friction it resulted in aa unique experience resulting in a Muslim community strongly Islamic in character while at the same time markedly distinctive and unique among its peers.

Islamic traditions blended with language, dress, cuisine, architecture, social customs and values of the natives to give rise to much of present day Indian culture.

Islamic rule saw a greater urbanization of India and the rise of many cities and their urban cultures. The biggest impact was upon trade resulting from a common commercial and legal system extending from Morocco to Indonesia. This change of emphasis on mercantilism and trade from the more strongly centralized governance systems further clashed with the agricultural based traditional economy and also provided fuel for social and political tensions.

A related development to the shifting economic was the establishment of Karkhanas, or small factories and the import and dissemination of technology through India and the rest of the world. The use of ceramic tiles in was adopted from architectural traditions of Iraq, Iran, and Central Asia. Rajasthan's blue pottery was a local variation of imported Chinese pottery. There is also the example of Sultan Abidin (1420-70) sending Kashmiri artisans to Samarqand to learn book-binding and paper making. Khurja and Siwan became renowned for pottery, Moradabad for brass ware, Mirzapur for carpets, Firozabad for glass wares, Farrukhabad for printing, Sahranpur and Nagina for wood-carving, Bidar and Lucknow for bidriware, Srinagar for papier-mache, Benaras for jewelry and textiles, and so on. On the flip-side encouraging such growth also resulted in higher taxes on the peasantry.

Numerous Indian scientific and mathematical advances and the Hindu-Arabic numerals were spread to the rest of the world [2] and much of the scholarly work and advances in the sciences of the age under Islamic nations across the globe were imported by the liberal patronage of Arts and Sciences by the rulers. The languages brought by Islam were modified by contact with local languages leading to the creation of several new languages, such as Urdu, which uses the modified Arabic script, but with more Persian words. The influences of these languages exist in several dialects in India today.

Islamic and Mughal architecture and art is widely noticeable in India, examples being the Taj Mahal and Qutub Minar.


Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_conquest_of_the_Indian_subcontinent